The gender approach in University teaching from the student’s standpoint
Published 2018-12-01
Keywords
- Higher education,
- Stereotype (psychology),
- Sociology of education
How to Cite
Abstract
The incorporation of the gender perspective in the processes of teaching and learning at the highest level is nowadays seen as one of the most appropriate strategies to deconstruct the discriminatory practices that women face in their daily life. Therefore, this study was raised with the purpose of knowing the opinion of students about the way in which the gender approach is addressed in the University classrooms. To achieve this objective, 125 students from four different degrees from the Universidad de Alicante (University of Alicante) who completed an ad hoc prepared questionnaire. The research was developed from a naturalistic prism, performing an analysis of conventional and summative content, assisted by the software AQUAD 7. According to the results and although the majority was clearly in favor of addressing these type of issues in class, their inclusion into the curricula was weak and deficient. Among the difficulties alleged for this, they highlighted, particularly, non-flexible agenda, the controversial nature of the content itself, or the ask of academic formation for professors. As a result, students suggested working on this approach through activities that motivates the joint effort, the dialogue and collective construction around a topic of maximum relevance do to its impact and social significance. On this basis it may be concluded and highlight the need of gender perspective transversalization in all courses and academic programs, which necessarily requires the awareness and academic formation of all the professors.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11298/883
DOI: http://doi.org/10.5377/entorno.v0i66.6729
Keywords:Â Higher education; Stereotype (psychology); Sociology of education; Higher education.
References
Atchison, A. L. (2013). The practical process of gender mainstreaming in the Political Science curriculum. Politics & Gender, 9(2), 228-235. DOI: 10.1017/ S1743923X13000081
Baily, S., & Holmarsdottir, H. B. (2015). The quality of equity? Reframing gender, development and education in the post-2020 landscape. Gender and Education. 27(7), 828-845. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1103842
Camacho-Miñano, M. J., & Girela-Rejón, M. J. (2017). Evaluación de una propuesta formativa sobre género en Educación FÃsica para estudiantes de Ciencias de la Actividad FÃsica y el Deporte. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte: revista de Ciencias de la Actividad FÃsica y del Deporte de la Universidad Católica de San Antonio. 36, 195-203.
Cassese, E.C.; Bos, A.L., & Duncan, L.E. (2012). Integrating gender into the Political Science core curriculum. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(2), 238-243. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096512000042
Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report. 19(32), 1-20.
Donoso-Vázquez, T., & Velasco-MartÃnez, A. (2013). ¿Por qué una propuesta de formación en perspectiva de género en el ámbito universitario?. Profesorado. Revista de CurrÃculum y Formación del Profesorado. 17(1), 71-88.
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2016a). Positive impact of gender mainstreaming in academia and research institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Offce of the European Union. Recuperado de http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/fles/documents/ mh0116826enn_without_blank_pages.pdf
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2016b). Gender equality in academia and research. Luxembourg: Publications Offce of the European Union. Recuperado de http://eige.europa.eu/sites/ default/files/2016.5791_eige_ gender_equality_in_ academia.pdf
Grünberg, L. (2011). From gender studies to gender IN studies and beyond. En L. Grünberg (Ed.), From gender studies to gender IN studies. Case studies on gender-inclusive curriculum in higher education. (7-15). Bucarest: Unesco-Cepes.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687
Hsingchen, Y. (2016). Transforming concepts into practices: mainstreaming gender in higher education. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(4), 392-413. DOI: 10.1080/12259276.2016.1242940
Huber, G. L., & Gürtler, L. (2013). AQUAD 7. Manual: The analysis of qualitative data. Tübingen, Germany: Authors. Recuperado de http://www. aquad.de/materials/ manual_aquad7/manual-e.pdf
Lätti, J. (2017). Individualized sex equality in transforming Finnish academia. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3), 258-276. DOI: 10.1177/1474904116668184
Lombardo, E., & Mergaert, L. (2013). Gender mainstreaming and resistance to gender training: a framework for studying implementation. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(4), 296-311. DOI: 10.1080/08038740.2013.
Lyle-Gonga, M. (2013). A critical analysis of gender mainstreaming. Politics & Gender. 9(2), 209-213. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X13000056
Mingo, A., & Moreno, H. (2017). Sexismo en la Universidad. Estudios Sociológicos. 35(105), 571-595. DOI: 10.24201/ es.2017v35n105.1434
Morley, L. (2010). Gender mainstreaming: myths and measurement in higher education in Ghana and Tanzania. Compare, 40(4), 533-550. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2010.490377
Serra, P., Soler, S., Prat, M.; Vizcarra, M.T., Garay, B., & Flintoff, A. (2016). The (in) visibility of gender knowledge in the Physical Activity and Sport Science degree in Spain. Sport, Education and Society. 23(4), 324-338. DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2016.1199016
Unesco. (2010). Gender issues in higher education. Bangkok: Unesco. Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001898/189825e.pdf
Verge, T., Ferrer-Fons, M., & González, M. J. (2018). Resistance to mainstreaming gender into the higher education curriculum. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 25(1), 86-101. DOI: 10.1177/1350506816688237
Wotipka, C.M.; Nakagawa, M., & Svec, J. (2018). Global linkages, the higher education pipeline, and national contexts: the worldwide growth of women faculty, 1970- 2012. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 59(3), 212-238. DOI: 10.1177/0020715218780475
Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology. 41, 331-357. DOI: 10.1146/ annurev-soc-071312-145659
Yu, Y. (2018). Using ‘classic Reading instruction’ to raise students’ gender awareness: student’s perceptions of their learning experiences at a Taiwanese university. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies. 24(1), 88-105. DOI: 10.1080/12259276.2017.1421292